Analytical Essay Super Size Me Essay

Welcome to At the Movies on ABC 1 and as usual Im your host, _______. Tonight well be reviewing the socially critical 2004 objective, Super size Me directed by and starring Morgan Spurlock. The film documents the 30 day percentage point in which Morgan Spurlock ate tercet meals a day consisting of nonhing tho McDonalds whilst following these four rules he can only eat things on sale, he moldiness super size his meal if asked, he must eat everything on the menu at least erst and lastly he must restrict himself to the average amount of exercise, typical of the American population. It too documents the drastic effects this lifestyle has on Spurlocks physical and psychological, wellbeing, and explores the dissipated forage industrys corporate influence, including how it encourages poor nutrition for its give birth profit. I found this documentary to be quite sweet and it was an overall quality film. Super Size Me was fun to watch with its colourful graphics and catchy lyric s which drew the reference closer and focused them on what Spurlock was representing.The documentary was effective in cr eating shock and disgust within the auditory modality to further help the hearing agree with and accept Spurlocks views. The narrative structure of Super Size Me was built around a central enigma, this being the obesity crisis facing the American people. The documentary follows a format, battle arraying the sense of hearing Spurlock eating McDonalds victuals and then feeling sick because of it and then followed by footage of Spurlock seeing a specialist to maintain both Spurlock and the audience of the many health risks this diet is inflicting on Spurlock. The documentary then proceeds to show such things as what school canteens argon serving kids at school. This is meant to shock the audience and position them to take what is happening to Spurlock and his health after eating fast food will also happen to the kids who ar eating unhealthy and processed mea ls at school every day. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) Spurlocks purpose in this documentary was to inform and position the audience to accept his views on Americas obesity epidemic.Read tooAnalytical Essay TopicsThis was achieved through cunning and intelligent choices as to what was filmed and what was cut out. He had also employed a number of other techniques such as camera angles, shot composition, change and well-educated use of music to stick with the visuals. Through these techniques Spurlock has effectively positioned the audience to accept his views on Americas aforementioned obesity epidemic. Spurlock has positioned the audience to accept a somewhat version of the truth as not all sides of the story are given a voice. The way in which Spurlock presents himself to the audience has also purposely been altered to position the audience to coincide with the attitudes hes presenting throughout the documentary. Spurlock intentionally wore relaxed clothing and stave directly to the au dience in order to position the audience to feel comfortable accepting Spurlocks attitudes towards Americas obesity crisis. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE)To further position and help the audience connect with Spulock, he has introduced them to his fianc whos a vegan chef which will be in juxtaposition to the unhealthy food served by most fast food restaurants. These inclusions provoke positioned the audience to feel close and trusting of Spurlock so that his opinions could be accepted. The use of derision during this documentary has been used because if the audience finds something humorous and therefore having a positive reaction, they are more in all probability to accept what is being represented. The use of irony was used throughout the documentary in such scenes as when Spurlock was referring to his headaches, stomach aches and general sick feeling from the food as McHeadaches and a McTummy. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE)This positions the audience to react in a way which enables them to ac cept the Spurlocks view on how McDonalds is affecting his health and how its making him largely sick.The audience is positioned to accept certain views without hearing or seeing the other sides of the argument. Spurlock has used bias by silencing or tarnishing the credibility of certain interviewees in interviews. When Spurlock interviews the CEO of McDonalds Australia, Guy Russo, the use of higher camera angles and editing positioned the audience to disagree and view what Guy Russo said negatively which in turn has led to the audience viewing poorly of McDonalds even though they were not completely silenced. Spurlock has also positioned the audience to accept the opinions and beliefs of the three medical specialists who are monitoring Spulocks health throughout the experiment. The use of eye take camera angles positions the audience to feel equal with the specialists as they present their opinions and to immediately recollect and accept what the specialists are saying due to the camera angles and their superior level of education within the medical field which once again positions the audience to accept their attitudes.The included footage has also been deliberately used to further position the audience to accept Spurlocks views on Americas fast food industries and how their corporate profit is heavy over the health of their consumers. Footage of the many advertisements and meals which are specifically positioned at kids were intentionally shown to position us to believe McDonalds is using these things to appeal to and lure the kids in. This then results in the audience being positioned to reflect poorly of McDonalds and their unremitting need of profits which are put over the wellbeing of their customers. Frequent shots of Spurlock without a shirt build intentionally been included to show the weight he may or may not have gained as a result of his high fat intake diet. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This positions the audience to once again retrieve poorly of McDonalds and the food they are serving as they are seeing the drastic effects that accompany Spurlocks heavy McDonalds diet. When the interviews between Spurlock and the three health experts took place, key terms where placed on the concealing so that they were imprinted into the viewers mind.These key terms included poor nutrition and especially colony which led the audience to believe how fast food is affecting the health of Spurlock and to view the companies behind the food negatively without taking into rollation the amount of fast food he is eating and how often its being eaten. The music and soundtrack within this documentary often complements the visuals, making it easier for the audience to accept the visuals or the lyrics of the complementing soundtrack. During the crack menu of the documentary and closing credits the Super Size Me song was played and the colours of the menu reflected the colours of the American flag. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This song was co-written by Spurlock and included phrases such as Super size me the American way and everythings bigger in America.These lyrics were intentionally used as they position the audience to accept that the American culture is the result of the American fast food industries influence on the American society whether its a positive or negative influence. Overall the documentary was very enjoyable to watch and I found the footage rather shocking and attention grabbing at times. It was a very instructive and eye opening documentary with a numerous number of techniques which position the audience to accept Spurlocks views on Americas thirst for profits which have sadly resulted in the percentage of grave citizens growing at an alarming rate.However, the use of the included techniques and selective editing resulted in a documentary which lacked objectivity. This lack of objectivity effected the audiences perception of fast food companies and how they might consider an alternative choice when deciding t o dine at McDonalds or any other fast food restaurant. Overall I gave this documentary, 3 out of 5 stars as it was enjoyable to watch but at times I felt as if I was being positioned and the whole experiment was over the top as someone coming from eating healthy vegan foods is obviously going to have a dramatically negative reaction to fatty fast foods, which is skewing the audiences perception of fast food companies.